next up previous contents
Next: Image Deconvolution Up: Imaging Previous: Weighting

Computation

Task invert is a fairly conventional imaging program, which produces a dirty image from a visibility dataset. It normally does this using a grid-and-FFT approach, although there are switches to use a direct Fourier transform and a median algorithm. Task invert

does not require the data to be sorted in any way. Normally any calibration tables are applied by invert on-the-fly (although this can be turned off with the nocal, nopol and nopass options). Both continuum or spectral line observations are handled.

We describe the inputs to invert . For MFS imaging, note options=mfs (and options=sdb) options.

Typical inputs to invert for a continuum experiment are given below.

For a spectral line observation, typical inputs would be

invert prints out a few numbers that may be of use -- the average system temperature, average system gain and theoretical rms noise. The theoretical rms noise is calculated assuming that the only source of error is the system temperature of the front-end receiver. No account is made of calibration errors, sidelobes or any other `instrumental' effects. The calculation correctly accounts for the weighting scheme used in the imaging process. This theoretical noise is the level you can expect in a detection experiment (assuming no interference or confusion), and it is the best one can hope for in high dynamic range work (usually instrumental effects will limit you before the noise in these sorts of experiments).

The noise calculation of invert (and all other MIRIAD tasks that compute the variance of a correlation) is based on values of system temperature, system gain, integration time and bandwidth stored in a dataset. Unfortunately data loaded into MIRIAD using fits will have only nominal system temperatures and system gains, and an educated guess is made for the integration time. Data loaded using MIRIAD atlod , the system temperatures are those measured on-line, and the integration time will be correct. See Chapter 8 for a discussion of setting you dataset up so that noise estimates are correct. The system gain, however, is still a nominal figure. If system temperature, system gain or integration time are incorrect by some factor, then the theoretical rms noise will also be wrong by a factor.

There is another effect which will cause invert 's noise estimate to be a factor of too pessimistic (i.e. the actual noise is a factor of lower than the printed value). With the ATCA correlator in its continuum (33 channel) mode, the channel bandwidth is twice as large as the separation between channels ( i.e. the channels are oversampled). Unfortunately invert assumes that the bandwidth is the same as the separation. This will only affect you if you are imaging individual correlator channels (i.e. no frequency averaging). It will not affect ``channel 0'' or multi-frequency synthesis imaging.


next up previous contents
Next: Image Deconvolution Up: Imaging Previous: Weighting


Last generated by rsault@atnf.csiro.au on 16 Jan 1996