z~6 SDSS QSOs [175_05 D04_06] data reduction log 28.2.06 F.Bertoldi

175_05 has used 12.8/13h, D04_06 used 0/6h
proposal.pdf (2005-09-08)
proposal.tex (2005-09-08)
IRAM database login as v_175_05 v_D04_06

Data reduction uses:

MOPSIC 06.02.2006, version 4.0
init.mopsic
oo.mopsic
ooc.mopsic for looping through quickly to find bad data
mydata.LIST
New: mopsic_redhat9060225 (.gz 6Mb)

Current data reduction summary

name      RA          Dec        z     flux  +-     time [s]    comment

0818+1722 08:18:27.40 17:22:51.8 6.00  1.784 0.4690 0.6043E+04  need more
0927+2001 09:27:21.82 20:01:23.7 5.79  5.186 0.714  0.4000E+04  enough data
1335+3533 13:35:50.81 35:33:15.8 5.93  2.678 0.8696 0.2289E+04  need more (DDT 2h in A)
1602+4228 16:02:54.18 42:28:22.9 6.07  1.887 0.8010 0.2859E+04  need more (DDT 2h in B)
J0353 (DDT D_04_06 3h in A)
J2315 (DDT D_04_06 3h in A)

when coadding all data without sn reduction: 1.983E+-0.33 23390sec. Useful data: 15191 / 23390 sec = 65%. meaning we have a lot of problems in our data: 2 scans have wrong RA offsets and cannot be coadded; many scans have high noise in half of the channels, reason unknown; three scans have asymmetric noise in the phase differences; several have strong acceleration effects. Scans 34-40 on Dec 18-19 are not useful, their total integration time adds to 2806 sec = 18% of our data. Note that the total overhead factor is apparently 12.8h/15191sec = 3.0. I would have expected 2.0.

0818+1722

without 6,37-41:  

6 and 37 have wrong RA offset, cannot be coadded
38-41 have acceleration spikes, ie bad data
1.545 0.463              calc per subscan weighting per subscan 
1.504 0.4805 0.5207E+04  calc per subscan weighting per subscan gate rms 10 70
1.784 0.4690 0.6043E+04  sub sub gate flux -10 20
1.103 0.4824 0.5545E+04  sub sub gate flux -10 10
1.533 0.4649 0.6172E+04  sub sub gate flux -20 20
1.753 0.499              sub sub med best7/46 5sigma -ch39,73 base111

0927+2001

5.058 0.174             sub sub med best7/46 5s -ch39,73 base111
5.186 0.714  0.4000E+04 sub sub med best7/46 5s -ch39,73 base122

1335+3533

2.481 0.7316 0.3997E+04 sub sub med best7/46 5s -ch39,73 base122
2.678 0.8696 0.2289E+04 ... not using 20051209 data

1602+4228

1.581 0.7219 0.3997E+04 sub sub med best7/46 5s -ch39,73 base122
1.887 0.8010 0.2859E+04 minus 2 noisy scans
1.886 0.8001 0.2859E+04 base133
0.655 0.721  0.2343E+04 base111 grid best12/46 4s cn med nw ds-5  -3scans  
1.147 0.8491 0.2343E+04 base111 grid best7/46 4s cn w ds-4 -3scans
1.306 0.8507 0.2343E+04 base133 grid ...      5s -3scans
1.499 0.8088 0.2747E+04 ... -2scans as above
1.844 0.8058 0.2859E+04 ... no gridding, mopsic of 6.2.06
1.646 0.8022 0.2796E+04 ... gridding old mopsic

All scans in time:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    source      date     subs scan#       comments
--------------------------------------------------
  1 0818+1722   06.12.05   20 20051206s35
  2 0927+2001   06.12.05   20 20051206s38 noisy half channels
  3 1335+3533   06.12.05   20 20051206s40
  4 1602+4228   06.12.05   20 20051206s46
  5 0927+2001   08.12.05   20 20051208s7  strong CN in 6 8 12 34 60 67 68 93 ...
  6 0818+1722   08.12.05   20 20051208s18 elev vibrations, RA offset wrong, USELESS
  7 1335+3533   08.12.05   20 20051208s32
  8 1602+4228   08.12.05   10 20051208s39 strong CN, USELESS
  9 1602+4228   08.12.05   10 20051208s40 strong CN, USELESS
 10 0818+1722   09.12.05   16 20051209s1
 11 0818+1722   09.12.05   16 20051209s2
 12 0818+1722   09.12.05   16 20051209s3
 13 0927+2001   09.12.05   16 20051209s9 
 14 0927+2001   09.12.05   16 20051209s10
 15 0927+2001   09.12.05   16 20051209s11
 16 0927+2001   09.12.05   16 20051209s12
 17 1335+3533   09.12.05   16 20051209s32 acc 6sig (spikes due to acceleration)
 18 1335+3533   09.12.05   16 20051209s33 acc 8sig
 19 1335+3533   09.12.05   16 20051209s34 acc 10sig
 20 1335+3533   09.12.05   16 20051209s35 acc 8sig
 21 1602+4228   09.12.05   16 20051209s39 ele<0? problem - need gridding in new mopsic
 22 1602+4228   09.12.05   16 20051209s40 ele<0? problem 
 23 1602+4228   09.12.05   16 20051209s41 ele<0? problem 
 24 1602+4228   09.12.05   16 20051209s42 ele<0? problem 
 25 0818+1722   15.12.05   16 20051215s149
 26 0818+1722   15.12.05   16 20051215s150 strong deviation at begin, spikes in TP
 27 0818+1722   15.12.05   16 20051215s151 same
 28 0818+1722   15.12.05   16 20051215s152 same
 29 0818+1722   17.12.05   16 20051217s2
 30 0818+1722   17.12.05   16 20051217s3
 31 0818+1722   17.12.05   16 20051217s4
 32 0818+1722   17.12.05   16 20051217s126
 33 0818+1722   18.12.05   16 20051218s1
 34 1335+3533   18.12.05   16 20051218s33 asymmetric spikes in pd USELESS!
 35 1335+3533   18.12.05   16 20051218s34 ... USELESS
 36 1335+3533   18.12.05   16 20051218s35 ... USELESS
 37 0818+1722   19.12.05   16 20051219s47  spikes and jump at begin; RA off wrong; USELESS
 38 0818+1722   19.12.05   16 20051219s48  same USELESS 
 39 0818+1722   19.12.05   16 20051219s49  very strong jump USELESS
 40 0818+1722   19.12.05   16 20051219s50  weak spike USELESS
 41 0818+1722   29.01.06   20 20060129s11  spikes USELESS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------
              date     JD           LST     elev
------------------------------------------------
 1 0818+1722  06.12.05 2453710.7290 10.2898 57.42 
 2 0927+2001  06.12.05 2453710.7492 10.7731 65.88 
 3 1335+3533  06.12.05 2453710.7731 11.3481 62.92 
 4 1602+4228  06.12.05 2453710.8209 12.4958 49.42 2453712.125
 5 0927+2001  08.12.05 2453712.5498  6.0983 43.23 
 6 0818+1722  08.12.05 2453712.6376  8.2219 70.32 
 7 1335+3533  08.12.05 2453712.7505 10.9337 58.02 
 8 1602+4228  08.12.05 2453712.8346 12.9464 54.33 
 9 1602+4228  08.12.05 2453712.8424 13.1397 56.46 
10 0818+1722  09.12.05 2453713.5026  5.0270 42.68 
11 0818+1722  09.12.05 2453713.5086  5.1715 44.37 
12 0818+1722  09.12.05 2453713.5146  5.3158 46.05 
13 0927+2001  09.12.05 2453713.5333  5.7721 39.35 
14 0927+2001  09.12.05 2453713.5396  5.9167 41.07 
15 0927+2001  09.12.05 2453713.5456  6.0632 42.81 
16 0927+2001  09.12.05 2453713.5516  6.2072 44.52 
17 1335+3533  09.12.05 2453713.7317 10.5457 53.47 
18 1335+3533  09.12.05 2453713.7379 10.6902 55.16 
19 1335+3533  09.12.05 2453713.7440 10.8353 56.87 
20 1335+3533  09.12.05 2453713.7499 10.9796 58.57 
21 1602+4228  09.12.05 2453713.8016 12.2297 46.55 
22 1602+4228  09.12.05 2453713.8079 12.3742 48.11 
23 1602+4228  09.12.05 2453713.8139 12.5185 49.67 
24 1602+4228  09.12.05 2453713.8199 12.6637 51.25 2453714.125 2453716.125 2453718.125 2453720.04167
25 0818+1722  15.12.05 2453720.4658  4.6080 37.73 
26 0818+1722  15.12.05 2453720.4722  4.7541 39.46 
27 0818+1722  15.12.05 2453720.4781  4.8973 41.16 
28 0818+1722  15.12.05 2453720.4841  5.0407 42.84 
29 0818+1722  17.12.05 2453721.5263  6.1317 55.23 
30 0818+1722  17.12.05 2453721.5326  6.2755 56.76 
31 0818+1722  17.12.05 2453721.5392  6.4359 58.43  2453722.04167
32 0818+1722  17.12.05 2453722.4886  5.2878 45.73 
33 0818+1722  18.12.05 2453722.5015  5.5916 49.22 
34 1335+3533  18.12.05 2453722.7206 10.8641 57.21 
35 1335+3533  18.12.05 2453722.7270 11.0208 59.05 
36 1335+3533  18.12.05 2453722.7331 11.1645 60.75 
37 0818+1722  19.12.05 2453723.7024 10.5005 55.18 
38 0818+1722  19.12.05 2453723.7087 10.6443 53.61 
39 0818+1722  19.12.05 2453723.7150 10.7975 51.91 
40 0818+1722  19.12.05 2453723.7210 10.9410 50.30 2453724
41 0818+1722  29.01.06 2453764.5663  9.9186 61.15 
-------------------------------------------------

DDT Request answer 14. Feb 06

 Dear Chris,

 In reply to your request for DDT observing time
 where you propose to add two new z>6 quasars to
 your on-going programme (175_05), I am happy
 to let you know that I accept your request as follows:

 - For the two new quasars (J2315 and J0353), 3 hours
  per source in A

 - For improving the s/n ratio of the two other source,
  I would recommend that you concentrate on J1335
  J1335 (2 hours in A.) I would suggest to put J1602
  for 2 hours in B.

 Please contact Clemens Thum for any further details
 concerning this request.

 With best regards,

 Pierre

DDT Request

   January 30, 2006
  
   From: C. Carilli (NRAO), F. Bertoldi (Bonn), K. Menten (MPIfR),
        P. Cox (IRAM) X. Fan, L. Jiang (Arizona), F. Walter (MPIA),
        plus 175_05 team
  
   To:   IRAM Director's office
  
   Re:   Addendum to 175_05 MAMBO: Discretionary time at the 30m/MAMBO
        to add two interesting new z=6.1 QSOs to the current program
        and for extra time on two possible new mambo detections
  
   cc: leon@iram.es
  
   To the Director's office,
  
   We have an on-going, approved program at the 30m (175_05) with MAMBO
   to image z = 6 SDSS QSOs at 250 GHz, in parallel with a program
   that is currently underway with the VLA to observe these sources at
   1.4 GHz.  These programs continue our successful study of the dust,
   that is currently underway with the VLA to observe these sources at
   1.4 GHz.  These programs continue our successful study of the dust,
   molecular gas, and star formation properties of the host galaxies of
   the highest redshift QSOs, approaching cosmic reionization,
   corresponding to the epoch of first galaxy and SMBH formation.
  
   We are requesting to extend this program this winter for two reasons:
  
   1. Over the past few weeks the SDSS group has discovered two new QSOs,
   listed below, both at z=6.1.  These two sources are particularly
   interesting in that they are a magnitude fainter (in the optical) than
   previous z=6 QSOs, and hence begin to broaden the sample in terms of
   their optical properties.  We would like to add these sources to
   175_05 this winter, asking for the same 3 hours per source (total new
   request = 6 hours with MAMBO) to maintain a uniform sensitivity for
   the full sample. The new sources at z=6.1 are:
  
   SDSS J2315-0023  23:15:46.567 -00:23:58.07  z_AB=20.82
   SDSS J0353+0104  03:53:49.718 +01:04:04.44  z_AB=20.53
  
   2. In our original sample of 4 QSOs this winter, we have one firm
   detection (0927+2201 at 5sigma), plus two likely detections (1335+3533
   and ?? at 2.5sigma).  We would like to confirm, or refute, the two
   lower SNR detections.  Each new mm source at z=6 becomes a critical
   target for follow-up molecular line studies, thereby extending mm
   astronomy into cosmic reionization and the first generation of
   galaxies. Hence, confirming possible detections is crucial. We ask for
   an additional 3 hours per source.
  
   Our total DD request is then 12 hours.
  
   Respectfully yours,
  
   Chris Carilli
   Socorro NM

Date of Mambo2 filling during the pool:

29.11.05
01.12.05
03.12.05
05.12.05
07.12.05  15:00 2453712.125
09.12.05  15:00 2453714.125
11.12.05  15:00 2453716.125
13.12.05  15:00 2453718.125
15.12.05  13:00 2453720.04167
16.12.05  
17.12.05  13:00 2453722.04167
19.12.05  12:00 2453724
21.12.05

09.01.06
11.01.06
13.01.06  15:00 2453749.125
15.01.06  12:00 2453751
17.01.06  15:00 2453753.125
19.01.06  14:00 2453755.08333
21.01.06  00:00 2453755.08333
24.01.06  16:30 2453760.1875
26.01.06  16:00 2453762.16667
28.01.06  

22.02.06  12:00 2453789
24.02.06  12:00 2453791
26:02.06  12:00 2453793