----------------------------------------------- 13.2. T7 5377-89 onoff 8x20 1x10 tau = 0.18 ----------------------------------------------- 16.2. T7 6099-6104 onoff 6x20 tau = 0.20 ----------------------------------------------- 17.3. T7 9675-7 onoff 3x ----------------------------------------------- 22.3. T7 0861-3 onoff 3x16 tau=0.1 ----------------------------------------------- 14.4. T7 4512-4 onoff 3x16 4516,21,23 map 3x 180 4 160 4 tau=0.35, good quality but short scan length ----------------------------------------------- 4.5. T7 2.5h no obs, weather ----------------------------------------------- 5.5 T7 4h no obs, weather ----------------------------------------------- 6.5. 01Q4B2 8385-90,8400 onoff 8391-2,5,9 3 maps 180x160 total obs time 3.5 h, tau~0.31 good map but scans short. ----------------------------------------------- 7.5. 01Q4MP 8758-9 onoff 8760 map 360x160 8763 map 360x200 total obs time 2.5 h, very stable, tau=0.15 very good map. ----------------------------------------------- 9.5. 01Q4MP 9419-20 onoff 2x16 9421 map 360x200 9424 map 350x100 total obs time 2 h, tau=0.5, unstable, partially cloudy ----------------------------------------------- 11.5 T7 9705-6,12-14 onoff 16 9708 map 360 6 180 4 ca. 2.5h tau=0.21, anom. refr., observed by Helmut W. ok map, a bit stripy ----------------------------------------------- 11.5 Q4, 2.5h no obs, weather ----------------------------------------------- 14.5. T7 0486-7 onoff 2x16 0488 map 360x180 peak flux > 50mJy tau = 0.5 total obs 3h, only 1 h on comet due to tech problems, LST too early, and then He ran out 1 hour early! good map -- too bad we dont have a second. ----------------------------------------------- 21.5. Q4 + T7, 6h no obs, weather -----------------------------------------------
pointing source J0010+110 # object date Julian date LST elev type file 1 BODYT7 13/02/04 2453049.1006 23.7193 66.77 o 20040213_5377 2 BODYT7 13/02/04 2453049.1055 23.8373 67.19 o 20040213_5378 forgot to focus before 5377, but its only 0.07 mm off. should be ok. Mars calibration is only 76%, so we might want to scale the flux up by 1/0.76. tau_z = 0.18 3 BODYT7 13/02/04 2453049.1224 0.2438 67.84 o 20040213_5383 4 BODYT7 13/02/04 2453049.1263 0.3369 67.80 o 20040213_5384 5 BODYT7 13/02/04 2453049.1301 0.4299 67.69 o 20040213_5385 6 BODYT7 13/02/04 2453049.1340 0.5231 67.52 o 20040213_5386 7 BODYT7 13/02/04 2453049.1379 0.6166 67.28 o 20040213_5387 8 BODYT7 13/02/04 2453049.1417 0.7095 66.97 o 20040213_5388 9 BODYT7 13/02/04 2453049.1468 0.8310 66.49 o 20040213_5389 results of coadded scans 1-9: --------------------------------------------------- signal +- time reduction options mJy mJy sec 0.3908E+01 0.9073E+00 0.1643E+04 100-300 pd 0.4966E+01 0.8548E+00 0.1643E+04 46-300 pd <---- 0.4886E+01 0.8864E+00 0.1644E+04 46-300 ph --------------------------------------------------- after recalibration: 6.5 +- 1.1 mJy
This is the coadded data of the first 9 scans.
Note that the emission around the reference channel 20 appears
extended, and is seen in most surrounding channels. This is not the
proper RA-DEC orientation - the angle is arbitrary.
pointing J0010+110. Mars and other calibrators are at 80% flux, thus scale flux up by 1/0.8. tau_z=0.20, no anomalous refraction. 10 BODYT7 16/02/04 2453052.1835 1.9121 58.04 o 20040216_6099 11 BODYT7 16/02/04 2453052.1873 2.0028 57.17 o 20040216_6100 12 BODYT7 16/02/04 2453052.1911 2.0935 56.29 o 20040216_6101 13 BODYT7 16/02/04 2453052.1948 2.1844 55.39 o 20040216_6102 14 BODYT7 16/02/04 2453052.1986 2.2751 54.47 o 20040216_6103 15 BODYT7 16/02/04 2453052.2024 2.3658 53.54 o 20040216_6104 results of coadded scans 10-15: --------------------------------------------------- signal +- time reduction options mJy mJy sec 0.5799E+01 0.1029E+01 0.1125E+04 46-300 ph 0.6391E+01 0.1059E+01 0.1125E+04 100-300 ph <---- --------------------------------------------------- after recalibration: 8.0 +- 1.3 mJy
This is the coadded data of scans 10 - 15 from Feb 16.
Note that the emission around the reference channel 20 appears
extended again.
Feb. 13.636 UT Delta = 1.985 r = 1.486 Feb. 16.697 1.993 1.438 osc element from Altenhoff Jan 2004: 2453118.560400d0 ! = 2004/04/23.06o4d0 = T 94.8574000d0 ! = Long. of Asc.Node 157.7381000d0 ! = Arg. of Perihel 160.5831000d0 ! = Inclination 0.6145700d0 ! = Perihelion Distance | Osc.Ep.=2453000.500000 1.0005020d0 ! = Eccentricity | =2003/12/27.000000 2000.000000d0 ! = J2000 = Elements equinox
Caution: Flux densities are not yet absolutely calibrated. Assumed calibration 33,000 counts/Jy. The actual number may be 20% lower, so the fluxes would be 20% higher. This still needs some careful analysis.
# object lambda date Julian date LST elev type file 1 BODYT7 .00000 13/02/04 2453049.1006 23.7192 66.77 o 20040213_5377.fits 2 BODYT7 .00000 13/02/04 2453049.1055 23.8372 67.19 o 20040213_5378.fits 3 BODYT7 .00000 13/02/04 2453049.1224 0.2438 67.84 o 20040213_5383.fits 4 BODYT7 .00000 13/02/04 2453049.1263 0.3369 67.80 o 20040213_5384.fits 5 BODYT7 .00000 13/02/04 2453049.1301 0.4298 67.69 o 20040213_5385.fits 6 BODYT7 .00000 13/02/04 2453049.1340 0.5231 67.52 o 20040213_5386.fits 7 BODYT7 .00000 13/02/04 2453049.1379 0.6166 67.28 o 20040213_5387.fits 8 BODYT7 .00000 13/02/04 2453049.1417 0.7095 66.97 o 20040213_5388.fits 9 BODYT7 .00000 13/02/04 2453049.1468 0.8310 66.49 o 20040213_5389.fits on 0.4896E+01 0.8778E+00 0.1643E+04 ph >52 best 0 on 0.4746E+01 0.9045E+00 0.1643E+04 ph >100 best 0
10 BODYT7 .00000 16/02/04 2453052.1835 1.9120 58.04 o 20040216_6099.fits 11 BODYT7 .00000 16/02/04 2453052.1873 2.0028 57.17 o 20040216_6100.fits 12 BODYT7 .00000 16/02/04 2453052.1911 2.0934 56.29 o 20040216_6101.fits 13 BODYT7 .00000 16/02/04 2453052.1948 2.1843 55.39 o 20040216_6102.fits 14 BODYT7 .00000 16/02/04 2453052.1986 2.2751 54.47 o 20040216_6103.fits 15 BODYT7 .00000 16/02/04 2453052.2024 2.3657 53.54 o 20040216_6104.fits on 0.6520E+01 0.9488E+00 0.1124E+04 ph > 60 b7
16 BODYT7 .00000 17/03/04 2453081.9859 23.1262 61.03 o 20040317_9675.fits 17 BODYT7 .00000 17/03/04 2453081.9936 23.3124 61.99 o 20040317_9676.fits 18 BODYT7 .00000 17/03/04 2453081.9968 23.3891 62.34 o 20040317_9677.fits on 0.1276E+02 0.1723E+01 0.4618E+03 ph > 60 b7
19 BODYT7 .00000 22/03/04 2453087.0935 2.0463 51.50 o 20040322_0861.fits 20 BODYT7 .00000 22/03/04 2453087.0973 2.1363 50.62 o 20040322_0862.fits 21 BODYT7 .00000 22/03/04 2453087.1004 2.2104 49.89 o 20040322_0863.fits on 0.9888E+01 0.1800E+01 0.4618E+03
22 BODYT7 .00000 14/04/04 2453109.7862 20.1602 30.91 o 20040414_4512.fits 23 BODYT7 .00000 14/04/04 2453109.7891 20.2300 31.70 o 20040414_4513.fits 24 BODYT7 .00000 14/04/04 2453109.7919 20.2983 32.48 o 20040414_4514.fits del ch 44 on 0.3194E+02 0.2499E+01 0.4524E+03
BODYT7 .00000 14/04/04 2453109.8009 20.5139 34.85 m 20040414_4516.fits BODYT7 .00000 14/04/04 2453109.8353 21.3440 43.71 m 20040414_4521.fits BODYT7 .00000 14/04/04 2453109.8622 21.9899 49.81 m 20040414_4523.fits peak flux 27 mJy. Gauss fits assuming different box sizes, 50, 100, 150, 200 arcsec. This is to give a first impression on the source extend. A more careful analysis still needs to be done. MI_map> gfit cur fie 50 GFIT> Fits in subf. with BLC: 65 66 TRC: 79 80 iter 7 0.453567922" 1.54841483" from centre FWHM 21.79" x 17.76" heigh 20.78 base 3.43 PA -82.13 MI_map> gfit cur fie 100 GFIT> Fits in subf. with BLC: 59 58 TRC: 87 86 iter 10 0.781247377" 1.3755734" from centre FWHM 28.99" x 24.46" heigh 19.08 base 1.24 PA -80.27 MI_map> gfit cur fie 150 GFIT> Fits in subf. with BLC: 52 52 TRC: 94 94 iter 22 1.16991699" 1.20047843" from centre FWHM 37.68" x 31.61" heigh 16.60 base 0.16 PA -78.26
25 BODYT7 .00000 11/05/04 2453136.7766 21.7031 24.45 o 20040511_9705.fits 26 BODYT7 .00000 11/05/04 2453136.7800 21.7867 25.29 o 20040511_9706.fits 27 BODYT7 .00000 11/05/04 2453136.8382 23.1877 37.70 o 20040511_9712.fits 28 BODYT7 .00000 11/05/04 2453136.8411 23.2576 38.21 o 20040511_9713.fits 29 BODYT7 .00000 11/05/04 2453136.8441 23.3275 38.70 o 20040511_9714.fits on 0.5489E+02 0.1918E+01 0.7413E+03 ph > 60 b7 on 0.5632E+02 0.1982E+01 0.7413E+03 ph > 100 b7
BODYT7 .00000 11/05/04 2453136.7894 22.0121 27.49 m 20040511_9708.fits bad weather, clouds moving through. peak flux = 67 mJy Gauss fit: MI_map> gfit cur fie 50 -4.8215971" 0.0883764401" from centre FWHM 20.30" x 12.12" heigh 51.98 base 12.41 PA 61.46 MI_map> gfit cur fie 100 -3.97369146" -1.78595126" from centre FWHM 31.51" x 25.91" heigh 41.45 base 3.76 PA -86.94 MI_map> gfit cur fie 150 -3.60055923" -2.70872974" from centre FWHM 39.12" x 32.70" heigh 38.04 base 0.99 PA -74.50
30 BODYT7 .00000 14/05/04 2453139.8094 22.6897 22.66 o 20040514_0486.fits 31 BODYT7 .00000 14/05/04 2453139.8135 22.7886 23.59 o 20040514_0487.fits on 0.7056E+02 0.6003E+01 0.2961E+03 ph > 100 b7
BODYT7 .00000 14/05/04 2453139.8163 22.8570 24.20 m 20040514_0488.fits low skynoise peak flux 83 mJy I_map> gfit cur fie 50 -3.99913096" -3.03163171" from centre FWHM 21.97" x 18.85" heigh 66.41 base 14.41 PA -86.76 MI_map> gfit cur fie 100 -5.00858688" -3.77263284" from centre FWHM 31.24" x 26.04" heigh 60.26 base 6.72 PA 79.69 MI_map> gfit cur fie 150 -5.619874" -4.31119108" from centre FWHM 38.23" x 31.86" heigh 54.88 base 3.60 PA 74.90
1 BODY01Q4B2 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.1559 6.5038 32.97 o 20040506_8385.fits 2 BODY01Q4B2 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.1582 6.5586 33.15 o 20040506_8386.fits 3 BODY01Q4B2 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.1605 6.6153 33.32 o 20040506_8387.fits 4 BODY01Q4B2 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.1629 6.6727 33.49 o 20040506_8388.fits 5 BODY01Q4B2 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.1665 6.7584 33.72 o 20040506_8389.fits 6 BODY01Q4B2 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.1700 6.8442 33.92 o 20040506_8390.fits 7 BODY01Q4B2 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.1736 6.9304 34.10 o 20040506_8391.fits 8 BODY01Q4B2 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.2485 8.7330 31.86 o 20040506_8400.fits 9 BODY01Q4B3 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.2514 8.8017 31.56 o 20040506_8401.fits on 0.1696E+02 0.1655E+01 0.1407E+04
BODY01Q4B2 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.1778 7.0309 34.25 m 20040506_8392.fits BODY01Q4B2 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.2066 7.7246 34.48 m 20040506_8395.fits BODY01Q4B2 .00000 06/05/04 2453132.2316 8.3257 33.31 m 20040506_8399.fits high skynoise peak flux 28 mJy Gauss fit: MI_map> gfit cur fie 50 4.19415092" -11.0170517" from centre FWHM 21.47" x 15.30" heigh 21.48 base 4.17 PA -40.90 MI_map> gfit cur fie 100 5.48149395" -12.226593" from centre FWHM 36.05" x 28.89" heigh 16.20 base 1.32 PA -6.88 MI_map> gfit cur fie 150 7.78820372" -14.2169247" from centre FWHM 71.14" x 49.28" heigh 12.71 base -1.22 PA 7.62
10 BODY01Q4MP .00000 07/05/04 2453133.2478 8.7819 37.36 o 20040507_8758.fits 11 BODY01Q4MP .00000 07/05/04 2453133.2507 8.8514 37.06 o 20040507_8759.fits 12 BODY01Q4MP .00000 07/05/04 2453133.3281 10.7130 23.97 o 20040507_8764.fits on 0.2589E+02 0.2227E+01 0.4466E+03
on 0.2589E+02 0.2227E+01 0.4466E+03 BODY01Q4MP .00000 07/05/04 2453133.2538 8.9253 36.69 m 20040507_8760.fits BODY01Q4MP .00000 07/05/04 2453133.2892 9.7778 31.57 m 20040507_8763.fits low skynoise peak 36 mJy Gauss fits: MI_map> gfit cur fie 50 4.5492897" -5.42974615" from centre FWHM 25.22" x 20.39" heigh 25.74 base 4.77 PA -60.96 MI_map> gfit cur fie 100 5.12383461" -6.5132513" from centre FWHM 31.22" x 26.00" heigh 23.79 base 2.96 PA -57.88 MI_map> gfit cur fie 150 5.67589426" -7.69886208" from centre FWHM 38.03" x 33.10" heigh 21.61 base 1.56 PA -50.87 MI_map> gfit cur fie 200 6.44730663" -9.23305225" from centre FWHM 47.31" x 42.46" heigh 18.96 base 0.52 PA -39.80
13 BODY01Q4MP .00000 09/05/04 2453135.2833 9.7680 42.66 o 20040509_9419.fits 14 BODY01Q4MP .00000 09/05/04 2453135.2862 9.8371 42.14 o 20040509_9420.fits on 0.2500E+02 0.6583E+01 0.3023E+03 looks strangely asymmetric.
BODY01Q4MP .00000 09/05/04 2453135.2897 9.9209 41.47 m 20040509_9421.fits BODY01Q4MP .00000 09/05/04 2453135.3401 11.1332 30.46 m 20040509_9427.fits strong skynoise, high opacity. probably useless.